AI’s Next Crisis: Water Scarcity

The problem in one sentence

As artificial intelligence demands more compute and data-center capacity, a surprising resource is becoming a bottleneck: fresh water. This is not just an environmental talking point  it’s a real, measurable risk for cities, utilities, and the tech companies building the AI future. (Bloomberg.com, Reuters)

---

Why water matters for AI infrastructure

When people think about the environmental cost of AI, electricity and carbon emissions often come to mind first. But data centers  the physical factories of AI  need to stay cool. Traditionally, cooling systems use water directly (evaporative cooling, cooling towers) or indirectly (water used to generate electricity that powers chillers). As AI models get bigger and more frequent, the cooling burden grows, and so does the thirst for water. (Institut Studi Lingkungan dan Energi, Bloomberg.com)

To put this in perspective:

• Some estimates show U.S. data centers consumed billions of gallons of water annually as of 2023, and those numbers could rise significantly as hyperscale AI facilities expand. (Finance & Commerce, Bloomberg.com)
• Hyperscale data centers (the huge facilities built by cloud providers) can use the water equivalent of a small town  sometimes millions of liters per day  to keep GPUs and servers operating safely. (Institut Studi Lingkungan dan Energi)

That combination surging compute demand plus water-intensive cooling creates a new class of trade-offs. Build data centers where power is cheap and renewable, or build them where water is plentiful? Increasingly, those two criteria do not overlap.

Who’s affected and who’s already responding?

Local communities and utilities

Many new AI-focused data centers are being sited in regions that are already water-stressed. When a hyperscale facility connects to local water supplies, it can put pressure on municipal systems and nearby agriculture. In several U.S. states and other parts of the world, utilities and planners are warning that continued growth could deepen local water stress. (Data Center Dynamics, Institut Studi Lingkungan dan Energi)

Big tech

Major cloud and AI firms are aware of the issue and are experimenting with alternatives. For example, Microsoft has publicly explored “zero-water” data center designs and other innovations aimed at reducing freshwater dependence. Likewise, immersion cooling and other liquid-based approaches are being piloted to reduce overall energy and water use. However, alternatives often come with trade-offs  cost, complexity, or new technical hurdles. (Bloomberg.com)

Regulators and local governments

Some cities and countries have already paused or instituted stricter reviews of new data center projects because of water concerns. This means permitting risk is rising: companies may face delays, additional mitigation costs, or outright rejections if local planners judge water impacts unacceptable. (ig.ft.com, Reuters)

Here’s an expanded, in-depth section on “The Numbers That Make This Urgent”, with at least three paragraphs, sources cited, and written in fluent, professional (yet approachable) English:

The Numbers That Make This Urgent

Global Scale: Trillions of Liters and Counting

By 2027, AI-related data centers are projected to withdraw up to 6.6 billion cubic meters of water annually, surpassing the yearly water use of multiple developed countries combined and equivalent to more than half the water consumption of the United Kingdom(arXiv, Wikipedia). That translates into a staggering 6.6 trillion liters each year, showcasing the sheer scale of demand. Meanwhile, recent data indicates that just under 560 billion liters more than half a trillion liters—are already being consumed annually by global data centers today; and that figure is expected to climb further as AI deployment and infrastructure continue to grow(Bloomberg.com).

Everyday Impact: Data Centers Like Small Towns

To make these big numbers more relatable: a single hyperscale data center can use between 11 million and 19 million liters of water per day comparable to the daily consumption of a town with 30,000 to 50,000 residents(blog.veoliawatertechnologies.co.uk, Wikipedia). Scaling that up, a typical 100-megawatt AI-capable facility might consume around 2 million liters daily, roughly matched to the daily needs of about 6,500 households(Wikipedia). This means that even a handful of these centers clustered in one region could have a massive, localized impact on water availability.

U.S.Context: Water Use Triples in Less Than a Decade

In the United States alone, drought-prone regions are already feeling the pressure. According to a U.S. Department of Energy report, data center water use increased from 21.2 billion liters (5.6 billion gallons) in 2014 to about 66 billion liters (17.4 billion gallons) by 2023 an almost threefold increase in under a decade(andthewest.stanford.edu). That surge has largely been driven by the growth of hyperscale facilities. Companies like Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon have since pledged to become “water positive” committing to replenish more water than they consume but activists emphasize that these promises don’t always address acute local pressures(andthewest.stanford.edu, Wikipedia).

Why These Numbers Should Matter to You

1. Scale and Growth
2. AI’s water footprint is no longer a niche issue it’s now a global-level concern with real consequences for ecosystems and cities.
3. Local Tension
4. Just one hyperscale data center can use the water of thousands of households each day. In areas with limited water, this competition can trigger community backlash.
5. Rapid Acceleration
6. In fewer than 10 years, U.S. data center water use has tripled indicating how fast demand is outpacing infrastructure and sustainability planning.

Why efficiency alone won’t solve it

Tech companies often publish per-request or per-prompt efficiency statistics to show progress, but there’s a classic economic rebound risk here: as AI gets cheaper and faster, people and businesses use it more sometimes a lot more. That increased usage can erase efficiency gains and drive overall resource use higher. This is sometimes called the Jevons paradox in environmental economics. (The Verge)

Moreover, per-interaction metrics can obscure geographic realities. A small amount of water or energy consumed in one region (with abundant hydropower and abundant water) is not the same as the same unit consumed in a drought-prone area. Transparency about where compute runs and how water is sourced is crucial.

Cooling alternatives: what works and what doesn’t?

Data center operators and researchers are exploring several strategies to reduce freshwater demand:

1. Air cooling and free cooling

Using outside air (when climate allows) can cut water use, but it’s climate-dependent and often insufficient for the hottest regions or the densest compute loads.

2. Immersion and liquid cooling

Submerging servers in dielectric liquids or using direct-to-chip liquid cooling is more efficient at heat transfer, reducing energy use and sometimes reducing water need. Major facilities have trialed these methods, and they look promising, but retrofitting older centers is complex and costly. (Bloomberg.com)

3. Zero-water designs and recycling

“Zero-water” concepts focus on closed-loop cooling, heat re-use, and high-efficiency air handling to minimize freshwater intake. Microsoft and others are researching such designs, but scaling them across thousands of megawatts of future demand is a heavy lift. (Bloomberg.com)

4. Seawater and alternative sources

Some coastal data centers explore seawater cooling, but that requires robust anti-corrosion systems and treatment and it’s obviously only an option near the ocean. Brackish water or treated wastewater can also be options but require investment and community negotiation.

Each approach has pros and cons. The right solution depends on geography, existing infrastructure, regulatory conditions, and long-term corporate commitments.

The human side: equity,agriculture, and climate resilience

Water is not just an input for servers; it’s a vital public good. When a large industrial user taps municipal or groun dwater sources, it can affect:

• Household supply and prices  smaller towns may face restricted taps or more expensive treatment.
• Agriculture  farmers may compete with industrial users for groundwater or surface water rights.
• Ecosystems streams, wetlands, and groundwater-dependent ecosystems can suffer from overdraft.

Thus, the “AI’s next crisis: water scarcity” framing is not just rhetoric. It signals potential conflicts between technological development and human livelihoods, especially in vulnerable regions.

What companies, regulators, and communities can do

Solving this isn’t about demonizing data centers they’re central to modern economies but about smarter decisions and shared responsibility. Some actions to consider:

• Transparent reporting: Companies should disclose site-level water use and the sources of that water (municipal, groundwater, reclaimed). Public data enables planners to make better choices. (Bloomberg.com)
• Strategic siting: Prioritize locations with sustainable water availability and renewable energy. Avoid clustering hyperscale facilities in drought-prone regions.
• Water contracts and offsets: Where water use is unavoidable, invest in local water infrastructure, recharge projects, or community resilience programs.
• Adopt low-water cooling technologies where feasible, and support R&D for scalable alternatives like immersion cooling or heat re-use systems.
• Regulatory collaboration: Local governments should assess cumulative impacts of multiple facilities and require robust water-management plans during permitting.

Case studies and early warning signs

• Permitting pauses: Several municipalities and regions have slowed or re-evaluated new data center permits because of water concerns, signaling that the political and regulatory climate is shifting. (ig.ft.com)
• Corporate moves: Microsoft’s public work on reducing water dependence shows industry recognition that old approaches won’t scale indefinitely. (Bloomberg.com)
• Investigations and reporting: Major outlets and research bodies have highlighted how AI-driven growth can stress local water systems, helping public awareness and prompting action. (Bloomberg.com, Reuters)

 what readers should know?

1. The phrase “AI’s next crisis: water scarcity” is more than clickbait. It captures a growing tension between digital expansion and physical resource limits.
2. Efficiency gains are important, but they are not a silver bullet: total demand growth can outpace per-unit improvements.
3. Policy, transparency, and technology must work together to prevent local water stress, protect communities, and ensure AI growth is sustainable.

---

Looking ahead: a practical roadmap

If policymakers, companies, and communities act now, the risk of painful trade-offs can be reduced. Practical next steps include:

• Mandating water-use reporting for large data centers.
• Incentivizing siting in low-risk areas and funding water-saving R&D.
• Creating local benefit agreements that invest in water projects for affected communities.

Finally, citizens and local stakeholders should engage in planning discussions early. The decisions made today about where and how to build AI infrastructure will determine whether AI’s next crisis is averted  or exacerbated.

AI promises enormous societal and economic benefits, but those gains must be weighed against the planet’s finite resources. “AI’s Next Crisis: Water Scarcity” is a wake-up call: without better siting, clearer reporting, and faster adoption of low-water technologies, the race to build AI capacity could leave communities parched. The good news is this is solvable  if industry, regulators, and civil society treat water as a central planning variable, not an afterthought.

Disclaimer

The information presented in this article is intended for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the content, data, and statistics cited herein, Nownesia cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of the information provided.

This article includes references to third-party sources such as Reuters, Bloomberg, and BBC, which are believed to be reliable at the time of publication. However, readers are advised to independently verify any figures or claims before using them as the basis for decision-making, especially for business, environmental, or investment purposes.

Nownesia and its authors shall not be held responsible for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from the use of the information in this article. The views expressed may not necessarily reflect those of Nownesia as a whole.